Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Beko DTLCE80051W IR vs Blomberg LTA09020W IR

81specifications compared
27differ
54identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Drying system
- DTLCE80051W IR:Condensation
- LTA09020W IR:Vented
Rated capacity
- DTLCE80051W IR:8 kg
- LTA09020W IR:9 kg
Cycle time
- DTLCE80051W IR:142 min
- LTA09020W IR:199 min
Noise level
- DTLCE80051W IR:66 dB
- LTA09020W IR:67 dB
Energy consumption per cycle (full load)
- DTLCE80051W IR:4.75 kWh
- LTA09020W IR:5.48 kWh
Weighted cycle time
- DTLCE80051W IR:107 min
- LTA09020W IR:141 min
Cycle time (partial load)
- DTLCE80051W IR:80 min
- LTA09020W IR:98 min
Condensation efficiency
- DTLCE80051W IR:81%
- LTA09020W IR:0%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DTLCE80051W IR, LTA09020W IR
99 specifications	A Beko DTLCE80051W IR View product	B Blomberg LTA09020W IR View product
Design1 differ
Drying systemDiffers	Condensation	Vented
Door hingeKnown for one	Left	Unknown — not stated by the source
Door styleKnown for one	Opaque door	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance10 differ
Rated capacityDiffers	8 kg	9 kg
Condensation efficiency classKnown for one	B	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cycle timeDiffers	142 min	199 min
Noise emission classKnown for one	C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelDiffers	66 dB	67 dB
Energy consumption per cycle (full load)Differs	4.75 kWh	5.48 kWh
Weighted cycle timeDiffers	107 min	141 min
Cycle time (partial load)Differs	80 min	98 min
Condensation efficiencyDiffers	81%	0%
Condensation efficiency (partial load)Differs	81%	0%
Energy consumption per cycle (partial load)Differs	2.53 kWh	2.74 kWh
Weighted condensation efficiencyDiffers	81%	0%
Ergonomics1 differ
Cycle time (full load)Differs	142 min	199 min
Water tank full indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water tank positionKnown for one	Top	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drum interior lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power6 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffers	B	C
Connected loadDiffers	2700 W	2400 W
CurrentDiffers	11.5 A	10 A
Energy consumptionDiffers	4.75 kWh	5.48 kWh
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	561.1 kWh	629.8 kWh
Energy efficiency index (EEI)Known for one	180	Unknown — not stated by the source
Heat sourceKnown for one	Electric	Unknown — not stated by the source
Heater powerDiffers	2300 W	2000 W
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	C
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A+++ to D
Connected load (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2400 W
Logistics data1 differ
Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) packaging weightDiffers	666 g	758 g
Paper packaging weightKnown for one	400 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brand-specific featuresidentical
Beko technologies (clothes care)Known for one	Automatic Anti-Creasing Function, Sensor Drying	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplier features1 differ
ManufacturerDiffers	Beko	BLOMBERG
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	568 mm	584 mm
HeightDiffers	846 mm	856 mm
WeightDiffers	33.5 kg	30 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Direct drain hose includedDiffers	Yes	No
Package depthDiffers	585 mm	595 mm
Package heightDiffers	880 mm	885 mm
Package weightDiffers	34.5 kg	31 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Vent hose diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 cm
Vent hose lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 m
Vent hose includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Vent positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rear bottom left

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons