All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

Beko BM3T48249PBDC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 13identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 has 1 kg more rated capacity than the Beko BM3T48249PBDC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (9 kg vs 8 kg). The Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 has 2 more drying programs than the Beko BM3T48249PBDC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (17 vs 15). The Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 has 24 min more cycle time than the Beko BM3T48249PBDC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load (198 min vs 174 min). Only the Beko BM3T48249PBDC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load has drum interior light. Only the Hoover HLP 9N3BXH-11 has Wi-Fi controlled.

  • Product colour
    • Black
    • Silver, White
  • Door colour
    • Transparent
    • Black
  • Control type
    • Buttons
    • Rotary, Touch
  • Rated capacity
    • 8 kg
    • 9 kg
  • Number of drying programs
    • 15
    • 17
  • Cycle time
    • 174 min
    • 198 min
  • Noise level
    • 64 dB
    • 62 dB
  • Drum interior light
    • Yes
    • No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
60 specifications
A

Beko

BM3T48249PBDC tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Model BM3T48249PBDC

View product
B

Hoover

HLP 9N3BXH-11View product
Design3 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackSilver, White
Door colourDiffersTransparentBlack
Control typeDiffersButtonsRotary, Touch
Drum volumeKnown for one111 L
Display typeKnown for oneLED
Drum materialKnown for oneStainless steel
Tub materialKnown for oneStainless steel
Suitable for undercounter installationKnown for oneNo
Door hingeKnown for oneRight
Door styleKnown for oneGlass window door
Inverter technologyKnown for oneYes
Performance5 differ
Rated capacityDiffers8 kg9 kg
Condensation efficiency classKnown for oneB
Number of drying programsDiffers1517
Drying programsDiffersCotton, Cotton eco, Synthetics, Mix, Wool, Silent, Delicate/silk, Timed, Jeans/denim, Sportswear, Down wear/duvet, Shirts 30min, Quick, Hygienic drying, Hygienic freshen-upAuto, Freshen-up, Hygienic drying, Cotton, White clothes, Delicate/silk, Synthetics, Colour, Eco, Wool, Sport, Quick, Sensitive, Download cycle, Daily
Cycle timeDiffers174 min198 min
Noise levelDiffers64 dB62 dB
Anti-Crease functionKnown for oneYes
Alternate rotationKnown for oneNo
Condensation efficiencyKnown for one88%
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR290
Ergonomics2 differ
Delay start (max)Known for one24 h
Drum interior lightDiffersYesNo
Remaining time indicationKnown for oneYes
LED program stage indicatorKnown for oneNo
Apps supportedKnown for onehOn
Downloadable additional programsKnown for oneYes
BluetoothKnown for oneYes
Wi-Fi controlledDiffersNoYes
Self-cleaningKnown for oneNo
Filter cleaning indicatorKnown for oneYes
Water tank full indicatorKnown for oneYes
Power1 differ
Energy consumption per 100 cyclesDiffers102 kWh110 kWh
Energy consumptionKnown for one1.1 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one230 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 Hz
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.47 W
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one188 kWh
Energy efficiency index (EEI)Known for one60
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers598 mm595 mm
DepthDiffers607 mm613 mm
HeightDiffers846 mm850 mm
WeightDiffers43 kg45 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers650 mm655 mm
Package depthDiffers630 mm678 mm
Package weightDiffers44 kg47 kg
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons