Product comparison · 2 tumble dryers

AEG T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load vs Samsung DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 17identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:Stainless steel, White
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:White
  • Door hinge
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:Left
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:Right
  • Display type
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:LCD
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:LED
  • Cycle time
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:173 min
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:170 min
  • Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:A+++
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:A++
  • Energy consumption
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:1.47 kWh
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:1.87 kWh
  • Annual energy consumption
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:176 kWh
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:235 kWh
  • Depth
    • T8DE86685 tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:665 mm
    • DV80M50101W tumble dryer Freestanding Front-load:640 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of T8DE86685, DV80M50101W
45 specifications
Design3 differ
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Loading typeFront-loadFront-load
Drying systemHeat pumpHeat pump
Product colourDiffersStainless steel, WhiteWhite
Door hingeDiffersLeftRight
Reversible doorsYesYes
Control typeButtons, RotaryButtons, Rotary
Drum volumeKnown for one118 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeDiffersLCDLED
Drum materialStainless steelStainless steel
Inverter technologyKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneWoolmark BlueUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Rated capacity8 kg8 kg
Condensation efficiency class (legacy scale)BB
Drying programsDiffersCotton, Iron dry, Cupboard dryWool, Mix, Timed, Quick, Delicate/silk, Blouse/shirt, Cotton, Towel, Synthetics
Cycle timeDiffers173 min170 min
Noise level65 dB65 dB
Moisture sensorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Extra dryKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Anti-Crease functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceR134a
Ergonomicsidentical
Delayed start timerYesYes
Drum interior lightYesYes
LED program stage indicatorYesYes
Adjustable feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Child lockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Water level indicatorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)DiffersA+++A++
Connected loadKnown for one700 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one230 VUnknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.05 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.05 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumptionDiffers1.47 kWh1.87 kWh
Annual energy consumptionDiffers176 kWh235 kWh
Heat sourceElectricElectric
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width600 mm600 mm
DepthDiffers665 mm640 mm
Height850 mm850 mm
Weight50 kg50 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one710 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one640 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one900 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one52.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tumble dryer comparisons

All tumble dryer comparisons