Product comparison · 2 touch screen overlays

LG KT-T65E touch screen overlay vs Samsung CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 4identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay has 3 ms more response time than the LG KT-T65E touch screen overlay (13 ms vs 10 ms). The LG KT-T65E touch screen overlay has 220 mm more width than the Samsung CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay (1496 mm vs 1276 mm). The LG KT-T65E touch screen overlay has 107 mm more height than the Samsung CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay (871.9 mm vs 764.9 mm). Display diagonal: 165.1 cm (65") on the LG KT-T65E touch screen overlay, 139.7 cm (55") on the Samsung CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay.

  • Display diagonal
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:165.1 cm (65")
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:139.7 cm (55")
  • Response time
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:10 ms
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:13 ms
  • Width
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:1496 mm
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:1276 mm
  • Height
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:871.9 mm
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:764.9 mm
  • Thickness
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:2.93 cm
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:2.68 cm
  • Weight
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:12.9 kg
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:9.8 kg
  • Package width
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:1676 mm
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:1367 mm
  • Package depth
    • KT-T65E touch screen overlay:190 mm
    • CY-TD55LDAH touch screen overlay:128 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of KT-T65E, CY-TD55LDAH
35 specifications
Features2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers165.1 cm (65")139.7 cm (55")
Display diagonal (metric)Known for one165.1 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
InterfaceKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Response timeDiffers10 ms13 ms
Light transmissionKnown for one85%Unknown — not stated by the source
Accuracy touchKnown for one1 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Anti-glare (AG) coatingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for one65SM5(K)D/E, 65SE3(K)D/EUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
ResolutionKnown for one1428 x 803 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Haze rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15%
Reflection rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10%
Frame materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceExtruded aluminium
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one1.8 WUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroidUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, Mac OS X 10.9 MavericksUnknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers1496 mm1276 mm
HeightDiffers871.9 mm764.9 mm
ThicknessDiffers2.93 cm2.68 cm
WeightDiffers12.9 kg9.8 kg
Glass thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.8 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers1676 mm1367 mm
Package depthDiffers190 mm128 mm
Package heightDiffers1042 mm879 mm
Package weightDiffers21.3 kg12.6 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More touch screen overlay comparisons

All touch screen overlay comparisons