Product comparison · 2 touch screen overlays

LG KT-T651 touch screen overlay vs Samsung CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay has 2 ms more response time than the LG KT-T651 touch screen overlay (12 ms vs 10 ms). The LG KT-T651 touch screen overlay has 729.6 mm more width than the Samsung CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay (1485.5 mm vs 755.9 mm). The LG KT-T651 touch screen overlay has 410.5 mm more height than the Samsung CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay (859.5 mm vs 449 mm). Display diagonal: 165.1 cm (65") on the LG KT-T651 touch screen overlay, 81.3 cm (32") on the Samsung CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay.

  • Display diagonal
    • KT-T651 touch screen overlay:165.1 cm (65")
    • CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay:81.3 cm (32")
  • Response time
    • KT-T651 touch screen overlay:10 ms
    • CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay:12 ms
  • Width
    • KT-T651 touch screen overlay:1485.5 mm
    • CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay:755.9 mm
  • Height
    • KT-T651 touch screen overlay:859.5 mm
    • CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay:449 mm
  • Thickness
    • KT-T651 touch screen overlay:2.35 cm
    • CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay:3.09 cm
  • Bezel width
    • KT-T651 touch screen overlay:2.7 cm
    • CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay:2.8 cm
  • Weight
    • KT-T651 touch screen overlay:18.5 kg
    • CY-TD32LDAH touch screen overlay:4.4 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of KT-T651, CY-TD32LDAH
33 specifications
Features2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers165.1 cm (65")81.3 cm (32")
Touch technologyMulti-touchMulti-touch
Touchscreen technologyInfraredInfrared
InterfaceKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of simultaneous touchpoints1010
Response timeDiffers10 ms12 ms
Light transmissionKnown for one85%Unknown — not stated by the source
Accuracy touchKnown for one1 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Anti-glare (AG) coatingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for oneLG 5SE3B, 65SM5B, 65SE3KB, 65SM5KB, 65SM5C, 65SM5KC, 65SE3D, 65SM5D, 65SE3KD, 65SM5KDUnknown — not stated by the source
ResolutionKnown for one1428 x 803 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Haze rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15%
Reflection rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10%
Frame materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceExtruded aluminium
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one1.31 WUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroidUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthDiffers1485.5 mm755.9 mm
HeightDiffers859.5 mm449 mm
ThicknessDiffers2.35 cm3.09 cm
Bezel widthDiffers2.7 cm2.8 cm
WeightDiffers18.5 kg4.4 kg
Glass thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.8 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 85%Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source842 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source102 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source535 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.1 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More touch screen overlay comparisons

All touch screen overlay comparisons