Product comparison · 2 touch screen overlays

LG KT-T490 touch screen overlay vs Samsung CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 3identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay has 3 ms more response time than the LG KT-T490 touch screen overlay (12 ms vs 9 ms). The Samsung CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay has 386.1 mm more width than the LG KT-T490 touch screen overlay (1518.1 mm vs 1132 mm). The Samsung CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay has 233.3 mm more height than the LG KT-T490 touch screen overlay (893.3 mm vs 660 mm). Display diagonal: 124.5 cm (49") on the LG KT-T490 touch screen overlay, 165.1 cm (65") on the Samsung CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay.

  • Display diagonal
    • KT-T490 touch screen overlay:124.5 cm (49")
    • CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay:165.1 cm (65")
  • Response time
    • KT-T490 touch screen overlay:9 ms
    • CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay:12 ms
  • Width
    • KT-T490 touch screen overlay:1132 mm
    • CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay:1518.1 mm
  • Height
    • KT-T490 touch screen overlay:660 mm
    • CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay:893.3 mm
  • Thickness
    • KT-T490 touch screen overlay:2.35 cm
    • CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay:2.96 cm
  • Weight
    • KT-T490 touch screen overlay:8 kg
    • CY-TE65ECD touch screen overlay:16.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of KT-T490, CY-TE65ECD
33 specifications
Features2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers124.5 cm (49")165.1 cm (65")
Touch technologyMulti-touchMulti-touch
Touchscreen technologyInfraredInfrared
InterfaceKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of simultaneous touchpoints1010
Response timeDiffers9 ms12 ms
Accuracy touchKnown for one1 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for oneLG 49SE3B, 49SM5B, 49SE3KB, 49SM5KB, 49SM3B, 49SL5BUnknown — not stated by the source
ResolutionKnown for one1428 x 803 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Standard interfacesKnown for oneUSB 2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Haze rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15%
Reflection rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10%
Frame materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceExtruded aluminium
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one1.31 WUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroidUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, Mac OS X 10.9 MavericksUnknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers1132 mm1518.1 mm
HeightDiffers660 mm893.3 mm
ThicknessDiffers2.35 cm2.96 cm
BordersKnown for one2.7 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers8 kg16.2 kg
Glass thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.2 mm
Bezel widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.79 cm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1654 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source265 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1012 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24.6 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More touch screen overlay comparisons

All touch screen overlay comparisons