Product comparison · 2 thin clients

Samsung NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321 vs Samsung Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 8identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

  • Processor model
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:TERA2321
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:A8-3510M
  • Internal memory
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:0.5 GB
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:4 GB
  • Total storage capacity
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:0.512 GB
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:32 GB
  • Storage media
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:Flash
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:SSD
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:6
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:2
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:0
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:2
  • DisplayPorts quantity
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:1
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:2
  • Power supply
    • NX-N2 430 g Black TERA2321:30 W
    • Q32CX4 Windows 7 Embedded:70 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of NX-N2, Q32CX4
49 specifications
Processor1 differ
Processor modelDiffersTERA2321A8-3510M
Processor familyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAMD A8
Processor coresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers0.5 GB4 GB
Memory slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2x SO-DIMM
Memory layout (slots x size)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 x 2 GB
Maximum internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 GB
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers0.512 GB32 GB
Storage mediaDiffersFlashSSD
Card reader integratedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of built-in speakersKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Speaker powerKnown for one2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces3 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers62
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers02
Microphone inKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts quantityDiffers12
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Line-outKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Console portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRS-232
Designidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power supplyDiffers30 W70 W
Power consumption (typical)Differs7.3 W29 W
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
Certificatesidentical
SafetyKnown for oneUL (USA), CSA (Canada), NEMKO (Norway), IRAM (Argentina)Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers150 mm310 mm
DepthDiffers126.4 mm32 mm
HeightDiffers38.3 mm219 mm
Width (without stand)Known for one30.4 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Depth (without stand)Known for one126.4 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Height (without stand)Known for one150 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers430 g1.8 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for one191 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one225 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one75 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers1.3 kg2.5 kg
Graphicsidentical
On-board graphics card modelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAMD Radeon HD 6620G
Softwareidentical
Operating system installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 7 Embedded
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More thin client comparisons

All thin client comparisons