Product comparison · 2 thin clients

itek P4W Z1 vs LG OPS-C001 Thin Client

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 14identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The itek P4W Z1 has 4 GB more internal memory than the LG OPS-C001 Thin Client (8 GB vs 4 GB). The LG OPS-C001 Thin Client has 2 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity than the itek P4W Z1 (3 vs 1). The LG OPS-C001 Thin Client has 140.8 mm more width than the itek P4W Z1 (177.8 mm vs 37 mm). Processor family: Intel® Core™ i3 on the itek P4W Z1, Intel® Celeron® on the LG OPS-C001 Thin Client.

  • Processor family
    • P4W Z1:Intel® Core™ i3
    • OPS-C001 Thin Client:Intel® Celeron®
  • Internal memory
    • P4W Z1:8 GB
    • OPS-C001 Thin Client:4 GB
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • P4W Z1:1
    • OPS-C001 Thin Client:3
  • Width
    • P4W Z1:37 mm
    • OPS-C001 Thin Client:177.8 mm
  • Depth
    • P4W Z1:186.5 mm
    • OPS-C001 Thin Client:27.9 mm
  • Height
    • P4W Z1:183 mm
    • OPS-C001 Thin Client:116.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of P4W Z1, OPS-C001
46 specifications
Processor1 differ
Processor manufacturerIntelIntel
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Core™ i3Intel® Celeron®
Processor generationKnown for one12th gen Intel® Core™ i3Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor modelKnown for onei3-12100TUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor coresKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor boost frequencyKnown for one4.1 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor cacheKnown for one12 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum turbo powerKnown for one69 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor base powerKnown for one35 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.8 GHz
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers8 GB4 GB
Internal memory typeDDR4-SDRAMDDR4-SDRAM
Memory clock speedKnown for one3200 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Storageidentical
Total storage capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage mediaSSDSSD
Card reader integratedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
NVMeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceM.2
Graphicsidentical
On-board graphics cardKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
On-board graphics card modelKnown for oneIntel UHD Graphics 730Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Wi-FiYesYes
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for oneWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LANYesYes
Ethernet LAN data rates10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports11
USB 2.0 ports quantity22
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers13
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphone inKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantity11
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
VESA mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Display includedNoNo
Softwareidentical
Operating system installedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power supplyKnown for one120 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers37 mm177.8 mm
DepthDiffers186.5 mm27.9 mm
HeightDiffers183 mm116.8 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More thin client comparisons

All thin client comparisons