All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 thin clients

HP Elite t655 vs HP Pro t550 Thin Client

Add a product
  • 36specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 20identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Elite t655 has 0.1 GHz more processor frequency than the HP Pro t550 Thin Client (2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The HP Elite t655 has 0.9 GHz more processor boost frequency than the HP Pro t550 Thin Client (3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The HP Elite t655 has 0.5 MB more l2 cache than the HP Pro t550 Thin Client (2 MB vs 1.5 MB). Processor manufacturer: AMD on the HP Elite t655, Intel on the HP Pro t550 Thin Client. Processor family: AMD Ryzen Embedded on the HP Elite t655, Intel® Celeron® on the HP Pro t550 Thin Client.

  • Processor frequency
    • 2.1 GHz
    • 2 GHz
  • Processor manufacturer
    • AMD
    • Intel
  • Processor family
    • AMD Ryzen Embedded
    • Intel® Celeron®
  • Processor model
    • R2314
    • J6412
  • Processor boost frequency
    • 3.5 GHz
    • 2.6 GHz
  • L2 cache
    • 2 MB
    • 1.5 MB
  • Memory slots
    • 2x SO-DIMM
    • 1x SO-DIMM
  • Total storage capacity
    • 256 GB
    • 32 GB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
61 specifications
A

HP

Elite t655View product
B

HP

Pro t550 Thin ClientView product
Processor6 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers2.1 GHz2 GHz
Processor manufacturerDiffersAMDIntel
Processor familyDiffersAMD Ryzen EmbeddedIntel® Celeron®
Processor generationKnown for oneAMD Ryzen Embedded R2000 Series
Processor modelDiffersR2314J6412
Processor boost frequencyDiffers3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Processor cacheKnown for one2 MB
L2 cacheDiffers2 MB1.5 MB
L3 cacheKnown for one4 MB
Memory1 differ
Memory clock speedKnown for one3200 MHz
Memory slotsDiffers2x SO-DIMM1x SO-DIMM
Maximum internal memoryKnown for one32 GB
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers256 GB32 GB
Storage mediaDiffersSSDeMMC
Number of storage drives installedKnown for one1
Storage drive interfaceKnown for onePCI Express
NVMeKnown for oneYes
Graphics1 differ
On-board GPU manufacturerKnown for oneAMD
On-board graphics card modelDiffersAMD Radeon GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneYes
Networkidentical
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Ports & interfaces3 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers02
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers13
DisplayPorts quantityDiffers32
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffersWindows 11 IoT EnterpriseSmart Zero
Bundled softwareKnown for oneHP Device Manager; HP Easy Shell; HP Easy Tools; HP Smart Zero Client Services; HP ThinUpdate; HP True Graphics; Microsoft SCCM/EDM Agent
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50/60 Hz
Certificatesidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChina
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersTCOENERGY STAR
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for oneLow Halogen
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers1.12 kg1.3 kg
Carbon footprintidentical
Carbon emissions, end-of-life (kg of CO2e)Known for one1
Carbon emissions, logistics (kg of CO2e)Known for one0.7
Carbon emissions, manufacturing (kg of CO2e)Known for one59
Total carbon emissions, w/o use phase (kg of CO2e)Known for one25
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one90
Other featuresidentical
Keyboard typeKnown for oneUSB
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one43211506
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one10 - 40 °C
Technical detailsidentical
Introduction yearKnown for one2025

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More thin client comparisons

All thin client comparisons