Product comparison · 2 thin clients

Acer Veriton N 282G 1.8 GHz Linux Black, Grey D525 vs Acer Veriton N 282G-ED30P 1.8 GHz Windows 7 Home Premium Black, Grey D525

Add a product
  • 29specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 25identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

  • Internal memory
    • Veriton N 282G 1.8 GHz Linux Black, Grey D525:4 GB
    • Veriton N 282G-ED30P 1.8 GHz Windows 7 Home Premium Black, Grey D525:2 GB
  • Internal memory type
    • Veriton N 282G 1.8 GHz Linux Black, Grey D525:DDR2-SDRAM
    • Veriton N 282G-ED30P 1.8 GHz Windows 7 Home Premium Black, Grey D525:DDR3-SDRAM
  • Total storage capacity
    • Veriton N 282G 1.8 GHz Linux Black, Grey D525:500 GB
    • Veriton N 282G-ED30P 1.8 GHz Windows 7 Home Premium Black, Grey D525:320 GB
  • Operating system installed
    • Veriton N 282G 1.8 GHz Linux Black, Grey D525:Linux
    • Veriton N 282G-ED30P 1.8 GHz Windows 7 Home Premium Black, Grey D525:Windows 7 Home Premium

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 282G, 282G-ED30P
35 specifications
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers4 GB2 GB
Internal memory typeDiffersDDR2-SDRAMDDR3-SDRAM
Storage1 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers500 GB320 GB
HDD speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5400 RPM
Graphicsidentical
Discrete graphics card modelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNVIDIA® ION™ 2
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffersLinuxWindows 7 Home Premium
Bundled softwareKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrosoft Office Starter, Bing Bar, Windows Live Essentials

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More thin client comparisons

All thin client comparisons