Product comparison · 2 temperature & humidity sensors

TP-Link Tapo T310 vs Vertiv RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired

8specifications compared
4differ
4identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Vertiv RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired has 3% more accuracy than the TP-Link Tapo T310 (6% vs 3%). Connectivity technology: Wireless on the TP-Link Tapo T310, Wired on the Vertiv RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired. Temperature measuring range: -20 - 60 °C on the TP-Link Tapo T310, -20 - 80 °C on the Vertiv RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired. Humidity measuring range: 0 - 99% on the TP-Link Tapo T310, 5 - 95% on the Vertiv RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired.

Connectivity technology
- Tapo T310:Wireless
- RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired:Wired
Temperature measuring range
- Tapo T310:-20 - 60 °C
- RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired:-20 - 80 °C
Humidity measuring range
- Tapo T310:0 - 99%
- RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired:5 - 95%
Accuracy
- Tapo T310:3%
- RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired:6%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Tapo T310, RTAFHD3-12
28 specifications	A TP-Link Tapo T310 View product	B Vertiv RTAFHD3-12 temperature/humidity sensor Indoor Temperature & humidity sensor Freestanding Wired Model RTAFHD3-12 View product
Features4 differ
Purpose	Indoor	Indoor
Sensor type	Temperature & humidity sensor	Temperature & humidity sensor
Type	Freestanding	Freestanding
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Temperature measuring rangeDiffers	-20 - 60 °C	-20 - 80 °C
Humidity measuring rangeDiffers	0 - 99%	5 - 95%
AccuracyDiffers	3%	6%
Checking intervalKnown for one	2 s	Unknown — not stated by the source
RF transmission frequencyKnown for one	868 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Temperature measurement unitsKnown for one	F, °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	FCC, CE, R-NZ, UKCA, JRF, VCCI, NCC, RCM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.6 m
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 99%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery typeKnown for one	CR2450	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery life (max)Known for one	2 year(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	46 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	12.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	46 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	66 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	85 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	26 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	57 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Compliance certificates	RoHS	RoHS
Sustainability complianceKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	United States
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90318080

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More temperature & humidity sensors comparisons

All temperature & humidity sensors comparisons