Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black vs Philips DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White

51specifications compared
11differ
40identical
9known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 5 h more talk time than the Philips DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White (16 h vs 11 h). The Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 50 h more standby time than the Philips DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White (250 h vs 200 h). The Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 266 g more weight than the Philips DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White (563 g vs 297 g). Product colour: Black on the Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black, Red, White on the Philips DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White. Backlight colour: Amber on the Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black, White on the Philips DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White.

Product colour
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Black
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:Red, White
Backlight colour
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Amber
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:White
Talk time
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:16 h
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:11 h
Standby time
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:250 h
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:200 h
Weight
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:563 g
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:297 g
Package depth
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:85 mm
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:59 mm
Package weight
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:672 g
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:382 g
Number of handsets included
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:2
- DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of D4002B/90, DCTG2801O/93
60 specifications	A Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model D4002B/90 View product	B Philips DCTG2801O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White Model DCTG2801O/93 View product
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Red, White
Backlight buttonsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Phone featuresidentical
Paging functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Management featuresidentical
Volume controlKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Digital
Clock with calendarKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Languages supportKnown for one	English	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display1 differ
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FSTN
Backlight colourDiffers	Amber	White
Power2 differ
Talk timeDiffers	16 h	11 h
Standby timeDiffers	250 h	200 h
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	563 g	297 g
Packaging data2 differ
Package depthDiffers	85 mm	59 mm
Package weightDiffers	672 g	382 g
Packaging content1 differ
Number of handsets includedDiffers	2	1
Other features3 differ
Clock/Date displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Package weightDiffers	0.672 kg	0.382 kg
QuantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Packaging net weightDiffers	0.563 kg	0.297 kg
Packaging tare weightDiffers	0.109 kg	0.085 kg
Specific absorption rate (SAR) value (EU)Known for one	0.1 W/kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons