Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black vs Philips DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White

51specifications compared
14differ
37identical
9known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 5 h more talk time than the Philips DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White (16 h vs 11 h). The Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 50 h more standby time than the Philips DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White (250 h vs 200 h). The Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 327 g more weight than the Philips DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White (563 g vs 236 g). Product colour: Black on the Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black, Red, White on the Philips DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White. Languages support: English on the Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black, English, Traditional Chinese on the Philips DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White.

Product colour
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Black
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:Red, White
Languages support
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:English
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:English, Traditional Chinese
Backlight colour
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Amber
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:White
Talk time
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:16 h
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:11 h
Standby time
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:250 h
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:200 h
Weight
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:563 g
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:236 g
Package width
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:184 mm
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:18.4 mm
Package depth
- D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:85 mm
- DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White:59 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of D4002B/90, DCTG2800O/93
60 specifications	A Philips D4002B/90 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model D4002B/90 View product	B Philips DCTG2800O/93 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Red, White Model DCTG2800O/93 View product
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Red, White
Backlight buttonsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Phone featuresidentical
Paging functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Management features1 differ
Volume controlKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Digital
Languages supportDiffers	English	English, Traditional Chinese
Clock with calendarKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display1 differ
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FSTN
Backlight colourDiffers	Amber	White
Power2 differ
Talk timeDiffers	16 h	11 h
Standby timeDiffers	250 h	200 h
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	0.7 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	563 g	236 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	184 mm	18.4 mm
Package depthDiffers	85 mm	59 mm
Package heightDiffers	135 mm	107 mm
Package weightDiffers	672 g	307 g
Packaging content1 differ
Number of handsets includedDiffers	2	1
Other features3 differ
Clock/Date displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Package weightDiffers	0.672 kg	0.307 kg
QuantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Packaging net weightDiffers	0.563 kg	0.236 kg
Packaging tare weightDiffers	0.109 kg	0.071 kg
Specific absorption rate (SAR) value (EU)Known for one	0.1 W/kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons