Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White vs Philips D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White

Add a product
  • 46specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 36identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 1 mm more package width than the Philips D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (185 mm vs 184 mm). The Philips D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 5 mm more package depth than the Philips D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (90 mm vs 85 mm). The Philips D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 1 mm more package height than the Philips D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (136 mm vs 135 mm). Only the Philips D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has wireless connection. Backlight colour: Orange on the Philips D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White, White on the Philips D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White.

  • Backlight colour
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:Orange
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:White
  • Wireless connection
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:No
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:Yes
  • Battery type
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:AAA
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:AAA NiMH
  • Package width
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:185 mm
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:184 mm
  • Package depth
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:90 mm
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:85 mm
  • Package height
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:136 mm
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:135 mm
  • Package weight
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:572 g
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:667 g
  • Package weight
    • D4001W/23 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.572 kg
    • D4002W/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.667 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of D4001W/23, D4002W/38
60 specifications
Performanceidentical
GAP compatibleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Silent modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Mounting typeKnown for oneDeskUnknown — not stated by the source
Phone featuresidentical
Paging functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Call managementidentical
RedialingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Indicationidentical
Battery capacity indicatorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery charge indicatorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display1 differ
Backlight colourDiffersOrangeWhite
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Wireless connectionDiffersNoYes
Power1 differ
Battery typeDiffersAAAAAA NiMH
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one449 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers185 mm184 mm
Package depthDiffers90 mm85 mm
Package heightDiffers136 mm135 mm
Package weightDiffers572 g667 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of handsets includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneNickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features3 differ
Battery level indicatorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers0.572 kg0.667 kg
Packaging net weightDiffers0.449 kg0.556 kg
Packaging tare weightDiffers0.123 kg0.111 kg
QuantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Specific absorption rate (SAR) value (EU)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.1 W/kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons