Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD4902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black vs Philips BeNear CD4951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black

42specifications compared
2differ
40identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD4951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD4902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black (0.55 W vs 0.5 W). Only the Philips BeNear CD4951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has answering machine.

Answering machine
- BeNear CD4902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:No
- BeNear CD4951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear CD4902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.5 W
- BeNear CD4951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.55 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD4902B/38, CD4951B/38
46 specifications	A Philips BeNear CD4902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model CD4902B/38 View product	B Philips BeNear CD4951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model CD4951B/38 View product
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffers	No	Yes
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 min
Designidentical
Buttons quantityKnown for one	20	Unknown — not stated by the source
Phone featuresidentical
Message counter on baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Management featuresidentical
Alarm clockKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.5 W	0.55 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons