Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD2902W/21 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White vs Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black

Add a product
  • 55specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 52identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD2902W/21 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). Only the Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has answering machine. Product colour: White on the Philips BeNear CD2902W/21 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White, Black on the Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black.

  • Answering machine
    • BeNear CD2902W/21 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:No
    • BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Yes
  • Product colour
    • BeNear CD2902W/21 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:White
    • BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Black
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • BeNear CD2902W/21 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.6 W
    • BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.65 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CD2902W/21, CD2951B/38
58 specifications
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffersNoYes
Recording timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 min
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Phone featuresidentical
Message counter on baseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs0.6 W0.65 W
Other featuresidentical
HandsetKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons