Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD2902B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black vs Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black

55specifications compared
2differ
53identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD2902B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). Only the Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has answering machine.

Answering machine
- BeNear CD2902B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:No
- BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear CD2902B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.6 W
- BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.65 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD2902B/51, CD2951B/38
58 specifications	A Philips BeNear CD2902B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model CD2902B/51 View product	B Philips BeNear CD2951B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model CD2951B/38 View product
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffers	No	Yes
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 min
Phone featuresidentical
Message counter on baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W
Other featuresidentical
HandsetKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons