Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT vs Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT

60specifications compared
3differ
57identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT has 33 g more weight than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT (413 g vs 380 g). The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT has 32 g more package weight than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT (529 g vs 497 g).

Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT:0.6 W
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT:0.65 W
Weight
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT:380 g
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT:413 g
Package weight
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT:497 g
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT:529 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD2901WB/FT, CD2951WB/FT
63 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901WB/FT Model CD2901WB/FT View product	B Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2951WB/FT Model CD2951WB/FT View product
Performanceidentical
Answering machineKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 min
Phone featuresidentical
Message counter on baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	380 g	413 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	497 g	529 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons