Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901W/90 vs Philips BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White

56specifications compared
3differ
53identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901W/90 (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). Only the Philips BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has answering machine. Only the Philips BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has built-in display.

Answering machine
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2901W/90:No
- BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:Yes
Built-in display
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2901W/90:No
- BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2901W/90:0.6 W
- BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.65 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD2901W/90, CD2951W/51
59 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2901W/90 Model CD2901W/90 View product	B Philips BeNear CD2951W/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White Model CD2951W/51 View product
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffers	No	Yes
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 min
Phone featuresidentical
Message counter on baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Indicationidentical
Battery charge indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display1 differ
Built-in displayDiffers	No	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons