Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2802W/FT vs Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT

44specifications compared
3differ
41identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2802W/FT (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2802W/FT has 1 more handsets included than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT (2 vs 1). Only the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT has plug and Play.

Plug and Play
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2802W/FT:No
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2802W/FT:0.6 W
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT:0.65 W
Number of handsets included
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2802W/FT:2
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD2802W/FT, CD2851W/FT
47 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2802W/FT Model CD2802W/FT View product	B Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/FT Model CD2851W/FT View product
Performanceidentical
Answering machineKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 min
Call managementidentical
Call log entriesKnown for one	50	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Plug and PlayDiffers	No	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W
Packaging content1 differ
Number of handsets includedDiffers	2	1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons