Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White vs Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78

51specifications compared
3differ
48identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78 has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 1 more handset than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78 (2 vs 1). Only the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78 has answering machine.

Answering machine
- BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:No
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.6 W
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78:0.65 W
Handset
- BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:2
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD2802W/78, CD2851W/78
52 specifications	A Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White Model CD2802W/78 View product	B Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851W/78 Model CD2851W/78 View product
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffers	No	Yes
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 min
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W
Other features1 differ
HandsetDiffers	2	1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons