Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White vs Philips BeNear Additional handset for cordless phone CD2850W/38

51specifications compared
3differ
48identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Additional handset for cordless phone CD2850W/38 has 0.1 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (0.7 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 1 more handset than the Philips BeNear Additional handset for cordless phone CD2850W/38 (2 vs 1). Only the Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has paging function.

Paging function
- BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:Yes
- BeNear Additional handset for cordless phone CD2850W/38:No
Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.6 W
- BeNear Additional handset for cordless phone CD2850W/38:0.7 W
Handset
- BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:2
- BeNear Additional handset for cordless phone CD2850W/38:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD2802W/78, CD2850W/38
51 specifications	A Philips BeNear CD2802W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White Model CD2802W/78 View product	B Philips BeNear Additional handset for cordless phone CD2850W/38 Model CD2850W/38 View product
Phone features1 differ
Paging functionDiffers	Yes	No
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.7 W
Other features1 differ
HandsetDiffers	2	1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons