Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU vs Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851B/RU

Add a product
  • 40specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 38identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851B/RU has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU has 1 more handsets included than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851B/RU (2 vs 1).

  • Power consumption (typical)
    • Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:0.6 W
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851B/RU:0.65 W
  • Number of handsets included
    • Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:2
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD2851B/RU:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CD2802B/RU, CD2851B/RU
47 specifications
Performanceidentical
Answering machineKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Recording timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 min
Call managementidentical
Call log entriesKnown for one50Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wireless connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs0.6 W0.65 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Base dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source102 x 79.5 x 108.4 mm
Handset dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source164.5 x 27.5 x 46.1 mm
Packaging content1 differ
Number of handsets includedDiffers21

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons