Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2801W/FT vs Philips BeNear CD2850W/DE telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White

40specifications compared
1differ
39identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD2850W/DE telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 0.1 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2801W/FT (0.7 W vs 0.6 W).

Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear Cordless phone CD2801W/FT:0.6 W
- BeNear CD2850W/DE telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.7 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD2801W/FT, CD2850W/DE
44 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2801W/FT Model CD2801W/FT View product	B Philips BeNear CD2850W/DE telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White Model CD2850W/DE View product
Performanceidentical
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DECT telephone
Call managementidentical
Call log entriesKnown for one	50	Unknown — not stated by the source
Indicationidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.7 W
Packaging contentidentical
Number of handsets includedKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons