Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD2801W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White vs Philips BeNear CD2852W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White

Add a product
  • 50specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 47identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD2852W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD2801W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips BeNear CD2852W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has 1 more handset than the Philips BeNear CD2801W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White (2 vs 1). Only the Philips BeNear CD2852W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White has answering machine.

  • Answering machine
    • BeNear CD2801W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:No
    • BeNear CD2852W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:Yes
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • BeNear CD2801W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.6 W
    • BeNear CD2852W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:0.65 W
  • Handset
    • BeNear CD2801W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:1
    • BeNear CD2852W/78 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID White:2

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CD2801W/78, CD2852W/78
52 specifications
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffersNoYes
Recording timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 min
Phone featuresidentical
Microphone muteKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs0.6 W0.65 W
Other features1 differ
HandsetDiffers12

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons