Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38 vs Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23

Add a product
  • 49specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 42identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23 has 50 entries more phonebook capacity than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38 (100 entries vs 50 entries). The Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23 has 10 more redial list capacity than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38 (20 vs 10). The Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23 has 1 h more talk time than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38 (17 h vs 16 h). Only the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38 has answering machine. Display diagonal: 4.06 cm (1.6") on the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38, 5.08 cm (2") on the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23.

  • Answering machine
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38:Yes
    • BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23:No
  • Phonebook capacity
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38:50 entries
    • BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23:100 entries
  • Redial list capacity
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38:10
    • BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23:20
  • Display diagonal
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38:4.06 cm (1.6")
    • BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23:5.08 cm (2")
  • Talk time
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38:16 h
    • BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23:17 h
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38:0.65 W
    • BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23:0.6 W
  • Battery capacity
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1962WB/38:650 mAh
    • BeNear Cordless phone CD2902WS/23:600 mAh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CD1962WB/38, CD2902WS/23
59 specifications
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffersYesNo
Recording timeKnown for one15 minUnknown — not stated by the source
IntercomKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Buttons quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20
Phone features1 differ
Phonebook capacityDiffers50 entries100 entries
Night modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Call management1 differ
Redial list capacityDiffers1020
Call log entriesKnown for one20Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Alarm clockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Indicationidentical
Battery charge indicatorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display1 differ
Display diagonalDiffers4.06 cm (1.6")5.08 cm (2")
Display number of linesKnown for one3 linesUnknown — not stated by the source
DisplayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFSTN
Power2 differ
Talk timeDiffers16 h17 h
Power consumption (typical)Differs0.65 W0.6 W
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers650 mAh600 mAh
Other featuresidentical
HandsetKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons