Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1912B/FT vs Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1962B/FT

37specifications compared
4differ
33identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

Answering machine
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1912B/FT:No
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1962B/FT:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1912B/FT:0.6 W
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1962B/FT:0.65 W
Package weight
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1912B/FT:0.56 kg
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1962B/FT:0.683 kg
Packaging net weight
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1912B/FT:0.412 kg
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1962B/FT:0.535 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD1912B/FT, CD1962B/FT
45 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1912B/FT Model CD1912B/FT View product	B Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1962B/FT Model CD1962B/FT View product
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffers	No	Yes
IntercomKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 min
Indicationidentical
Battery full indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery capacity indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Displayidentical
Display diagonalKnown for one	4.06 cm (1.6")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W
Other features2 differ
Base station keysKnown for one	Paging key	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers	0.56 kg	0.683 kg
Packaging net weightDiffers	0.412 kg	0.535 kg
Signal strength indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons