Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD1902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black vs Philips BeNear CD1952B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black

49specifications compared
2differ
47identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD1952B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD1902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). Power requirements: 100 - 240VAC on the Philips BeNear CD1902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black, 100 - 240VAC, 50/60Hz on the Philips BeNear CD1952B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black.

Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear CD1902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.6 W
- BeNear CD1952B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.65 W
Power requirements
- BeNear CD1902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:100 - 240VAC
- BeNear CD1952B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:100 - 240VAC, 50/60Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD1902B/38, CD1952B/38
50 specifications	A Philips BeNear CD1902B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model CD1902B/38 View product	B Philips BeNear CD1952B/38 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black Model CD1952B/38 View product
Management featuresidentical
Volume controlKnown for one	Digital	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W
Power requirementsDiffers	100 - 240VAC	100 - 240VAC, 50/60Hz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons