Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90 vs Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU

32specifications compared
10differ
22identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU has 50 entries more phonebook capacity than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90 (100 entries vs 50 entries). The Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU has 1 more multi handset capability than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90 (5 vs 4). The Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU has 10 more redial list capacity than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90 (20 vs 10). Product colour: Red, White on the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90, Black on the Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU. Display diagonal: 4.06 cm (1.6") on the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90, 4.57 cm (1.8") on the Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU.

Product colour
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:Red, White
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:Black
Phonebook capacity
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:50 entries
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:100 entries
Multi handset capability
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:4
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:5
Redial list capacity
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:10
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:20
Call log entries
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:20
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:50
Display diagonal
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:4.06 cm (1.6")
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:4.57 cm (1.8")
Talk time
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:16 h
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:15 h
Standby time
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90:250 h
- Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU:220 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD1901WR/90, CD2802B/RU
48 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1901WR/90 Model CD1901WR/90 View product	B Philips Perfect sound Cordless phone CD2802B/RU Model CD2802B/RU View product
Performanceidentical
Ringer typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Polyphonic
Maximum indoor rangeKnown for one	50 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum outdoor rangeKnown for one	300 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Red, White	Black
Backlight buttonsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Integrated antennaKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Phone features2 differ
SpeakerphoneKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Phonebook capacityDiffers	50 entries	100 entries
Multi handset capabilityDiffers	4	5
Paging functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call management2 differ
Redial list capacityDiffers	10	20
Call log entriesDiffers	20	50
Management featuresidentical
Alarm clockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Programmable hot keysKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Indicationidentical
Battery charge indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Display1 differ
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FSTN
Display diagonalDiffers	4.06 cm (1.6")	4.57 cm (1.8")
Power2 differ
Talk timeDiffers	16 h	15 h
Standby timeDiffers	250 h	220 h
Packaging content1 differ
Number of handsets includedDiffers	1	2
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers	600 mAh	650 mAh
Other featuresidentical
Signal strength indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless connectionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	1.8 m	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons