Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear CD1901B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black vs Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1952B/51

Add a product
  • 46specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 44identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1952B/51 has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD1901B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). Only the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1952B/51 has answering machine.

  • Answering machine
    • BeNear CD1901B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:No
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1952B/51:Yes
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • BeNear CD1901B/51 telephone DECT telephone Caller ID Black:0.6 W
    • BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1952B/51:0.65 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CD1901B/51, CD1952B/51
50 specifications
Performance1 differ
Answering machineDiffersNoYes
Recording timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 min
Phone featuresidentical
Wallpapers & colour schemesKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs0.6 W0.65 W
Other featuresidentical
Number of products includedKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Camera includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons