Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1861B/RU vs Philips BeNear CD1864B/FR telephone Caller ID Black

38specifications compared
2differ
36identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1861B/RU has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear CD1864B/FR telephone Caller ID Black (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips BeNear CD1864B/FR telephone Caller ID Black has 3 more handsets included than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1861B/RU (4 vs 1).

Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1861B/RU:0.65 W
- BeNear CD1864B/FR telephone Caller ID Black:0.6 W
Number of handsets included
- BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1861B/RU:1
- BeNear CD1864B/FR telephone Caller ID Black:4

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD1861B/RU, CD1864B/FR
38 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone with answering machine CD1861B/RU Model CD1861B/RU View product	B Philips BeNear CD1864B/FR telephone Caller ID Black Model CD1864B/FR View product
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.65 W	0.6 W
Packaging content1 differ
Number of handsets includedDiffers	1	4

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons