Product comparison · 2 telephones

Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1811B/GB vs Philips BeNear CD1863B/FR telephone Caller ID Black

36specifications compared
2differ
34identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips BeNear CD1863B/FR telephone Caller ID Black has 0.05 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1811B/GB (0.65 W vs 0.6 W). The Philips BeNear CD1863B/FR telephone Caller ID Black has 2 more handsets included than the Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1811B/GB (3 vs 1).

Power consumption (typical)
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1811B/GB:0.6 W
- BeNear CD1863B/FR telephone Caller ID Black:0.65 W
Number of handsets included
- BeNear Cordless phone CD1811B/GB:1
- BeNear CD1863B/FR telephone Caller ID Black:3

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD1811B/GB, CD1863B/FR
39 specifications	A Philips BeNear Cordless phone CD1811B/GB Model CD1811B/GB View product	B Philips BeNear CD1863B/FR telephone Caller ID Black Model CD1863B/FR View product
Performanceidentical
Answering machineKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Recording timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 min
TypeKnown for one	DECT telephone	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	0.6 W	0.65 W
Packaging content1 differ
Number of handsets includedDiffers	1	3

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More telephone comparisons

All telephone comparisons