All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 tablets

Acer Iconia A8-21M-A3ES Allwinner vs Honor Pad 20

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 9identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Honor Pad 20 has 4 GB more internal memory than the Acer Iconia A8-21M-A3ES Allwinner (8 GB vs 4 GB). The Honor Pad 20 has 192 GB more internal storage capacity than the Acer Iconia A8-21M-A3ES Allwinner (256 GB vs 64 GB). The Honor Pad 20 has 3 MP more front camera resolution (numeric) than the Acer Iconia A8-21M-A3ES Allwinner (8 MP vs 5 MP). Display diagonal: 21.8 cm (8.6") on the Acer Iconia A8-21M-A3ES Allwinner, 30.7 cm (12.1") on the Honor Pad 20. Panel type: IPS on the Acer Iconia A8-21M-A3ES Allwinner, LCD on the Honor Pad 20.

  • Display diagonal
    • 21.8 cm (8.6")
    • 30.7 cm (12.1")
  • Panel type
    • IPS
    • LCD
  • Display resolution
    • 1280 x 800 pixels
    • 3000 x 1872 pixels
  • Processor manufacturer
    • Allwinner Technology
    • Qualcomm
  • Processor family
    • Allwinner
    • Snapdragon
  • Processor model
    • A537
    • 7 Gen 3
  • Internal memory
    • 4 GB
    • 8 GB
  • Internal storage capacity
    • 64 GB
    • 256 GB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
55 specifications
A

Acer

Iconia A8-21M-A3ES Allwinner

Model A8-21M-A3ES

View product
B

Honor

Pad 20View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers21.8 cm (8.6")30.7 cm (12.1")
Panel typeDiffersIPSLCD
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 800 pixels3000 x 1872 pixels
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one120 Hz
Display brightnessKnown for one700 cd/m²
Pixel densityKnown for one292 ppi
Display number of coloursKnown for one1.07 billion
Flicker-free DC dimmingKnown for oneYes
HD typeKnown for oneWXGA
Processor3 differ
Processor manufacturerDiffersAllwinner TechnologyQualcomm
Processor familyDiffersAllwinnerSnapdragon
Processor modelDiffersA5377 Gen 3
Processor frequencyKnown for one2 GHz
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers4 GB8 GB
Internal memory typeKnown for oneLPDDR4-SDRAM
Storage1 differ
Internal storage capacityDiffers64 GB256 GB
Storage mediaKnown for oneeMMC
Camera1 differ
Rear camera aperture numberKnown for one2
Front camera aperture numberKnown for one2
Front camera resolution (numeric)Differs5 MP8 MP
Network1 differ
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)Known for oneYes
Bluetooth versionKnown for one5.3
Top Wi-Fi standardDiffersWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Mobile network connectionKnown for oneNo
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersSilverGrey
Housing materialKnown for oneMetal
Colour nameKnown for oneVapor Silver
Softwareidentical
Operating system installedKnown for oneAndroid 16
User interface (UI)Known for oneMagicOS 10
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersLithiumLithium Polymer (LiPo)
Battery capacityKnown for one10100 mAh
Battery endurance in cyclesKnown for one1600
Number of battery cellsKnown for one2
Poweridentical
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for one10 W
Enduranceidentical
Energy efficiency classKnown for oneG
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA to G
Battery endurance per cycleKnown for one5557 min
Repeated free fall reliability classKnown for oneE
Repairability classKnown for oneC
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for oneIP40
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers216.2 mm277.1 mm
DepthDiffers130 mm6.29 mm
HeightDiffers7.9 mm179.3 mm
WeightDiffers410 g525 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet comparisons

All tablet comparisons