Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

Onsala Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro vs Targus THZ67603GL tablet case

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 5identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Onsala Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro has 170 mm more width than the Targus THZ67603GL tablet case (195 mm vs 25 mm). The Targus THZ67603GL tablet case has 175 mm more depth than the Onsala Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro (195 mm vs 20 mm). The Onsala Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro has 50 mm more height than the Targus THZ67603GL tablet case (310 mm vs 260 mm). Maximum screen size: 27.9 cm (11") on the Onsala Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro, 26.7 cm (10.5") on the Targus THZ67603GL tablet case. Case type: Cover on the Onsala Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro, Folio on the Targus THZ67603GL tablet case.

  • Maximum screen size
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:27.9 cm (11")
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:26.7 cm (10.5")
  • Case type
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:Cover
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:Folio
  • Product main colour
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:Black
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:Red
  • Width
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:195 mm
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:25 mm
  • Depth
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:20 mm
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:195 mm
  • Height
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:310 mm
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:260 mm
  • Weight
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:396 g
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:350 g
  • Package width
    • Tablet Cover Black - iPad Pro:195 mm
    • THZ67603GL tablet case:25 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 667571, THZ67603GL
37 specifications
Features4 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers27.9 cm (11")26.7 cm (10.5")
Case typeDiffersCoverFolio
MaterialKnown for oneLeatherUnknown — not stated by the source
Product main colourDiffersBlackRed
Brand compatibilityAppleApple
CompatibilityDiffersiPad Air 11" 24/25, iPad Air 10.9" 20/22iPad Air iPad Pro
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Stand modeYesYes
Number of stand modesKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Closure typeMagnetic closureMagnetic closure
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Built-in batteryNoNo
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers195 mm25 mm
DepthDiffers20 mm195 mm
HeightDiffers310 mm260 mm
WeightDiffers396 g350 g
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers195 mm25 mm
Package depthDiffers20 mm200 mm
Package heightDiffers310 mm295 mm
Package weightDiffers440 g410 g
Package volumeKnown for one1210 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneBlisterUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Combined Nomenclature (CN) codeKnown for one42029109Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data2 differ
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one4202918090Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseDiffers25 pc(s)20 pc(s)
Products per palletDiffers350 pc(s)400 pc(s)
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one43191601.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15.9 cm
Shipping (inner) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20.3 cm
Shipping (inner) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source31.4 cm
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source340 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source437 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source335 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9.56 kg
Shipping (inner) case net weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.2 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons