Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

DEQSTER Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.) vs DEQSTER Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU

Add a product
  • 71specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 54identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

The DEQSTER Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU has 242 mm more depth than the DEQSTER Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.) (260 mm vs 18 mm). The DEQSTER Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.) has 242 mm more height than the DEQSTER Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU (260 mm vs 18 mm). The DEQSTER Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU has 10 g more weight than the DEQSTER Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.) (340 g vs 330 g). Only the DEQSTER Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU has integrated compartment(s). Maximum screen size: 27.7 cm (10.9") on the DEQSTER Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.), 25.9 cm (10.2") on the DEQSTER Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU.

  • Maximum screen size
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):27.7 cm (10.9")
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:25.9 cm (10.2")
  • Colour name
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):Blue
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:Bright Azure
  • Compatibility
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):iPad 10 Gen.
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:iPad 10, 2" (7./8./9. Gen.)
  • Integrated compartment(s)
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):No
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:Yes
  • Depth
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):18 mm
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:260 mm
  • Height
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):260 mm
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:18 mm
  • Weight
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):330 g
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:340 g
  • Package width
    • Rugged MAX Case for iPad 10.9″ (10th Gen.):195 mm
    • Rugged Case 2021, #RQ1 iPad 10.2″ (7./8./9. Gen.), EDU:204 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 40-1013766, 40-738343
75 specifications
Features6 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers27.7 cm (10.9")25.9 cm (10.2")
MaterialDiffersPolycarbonate (PC), Polyurethane, Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)Microfibre, Polyurethane, Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Colour nameDiffersBlueBright Azure
CompatibilityDiffersiPad 10 Gen.iPad 10, 2" (7./8./9. Gen.)
Integrated compartment(s)DiffersNoYes
Protection featuresDiffersBump resistant, Dirt resistant, Drop resistance, Dust resistant, Knock resistant, Scratch resistant, Shock resistant, Splash proof, Vibration proofBump resistant, Drop resistance, Scratch resistant, Shock resistant, Water resistant
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers18 mm260 mm
HeightDiffers260 mm18 mm
ThicknessKnown for one1.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers330 g340 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers195 mm204 mm
Package depthDiffers18 mm268 mm
Package heightDiffers260 mm2 mm
Package weightDiffers25 g10 g
Technical detailsidentical
Drying instructionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDo not tumble dry
Other features4 differ
Built-in subwooferKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible productsDiffersApple iPad 10.9" (10. Gen.)Apple iPad 10.2" (7./8./9. Gen.)
FeaturesDiffersIntegrated pen holder, magnetic closure, Trifold StandIntegrated pen holder, magnetic closure, Trifold Stand, transparent back
Optimized forDiffersApple iPad 10.9"Apple iPad 10.2"
Packaging contentDiffers1 x DEQSTER Rugged Max Case 10.9"1 x DEQSTER Rugged Case for iPad 10.2"
BrandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDEQSTER

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons