Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

DEQSTER 360° Rugged Case for iPad vs DEQSTER Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro

Add a product
  • 68specifications compared
  • 26differ
  • 42identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The DEQSTER Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro has 1 more stand modes than the DEQSTER 360° Rugged Case for iPad (3 vs 2). The DEQSTER Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro has 0.2 m more shockproof up to than the DEQSTER 360° Rugged Case for iPad (1.4 m vs 1.2 m). The DEQSTER Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro has 92 mm more width than the DEQSTER 360° Rugged Case for iPad (287 mm vs 195 mm). Only the DEQSTER Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro has integrated compartment(s). Only the DEQSTER Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro has auto wake/sleep function.

  • Maximum screen size
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:25.9 cm (10.2")
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:32.8 cm (12.9")
  • Case type
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:Cover
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:Flip case
  • Product main colour
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:Black
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:Green
  • Colour name
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:black
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:Forest Green
  • Number of stand modes
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:2
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:3
  • Closure type
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:Snap closure
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:Flap closure
  • Integrated compartment(s)
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:No
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:Yes
  • Shockproof up to
    • 360° Rugged Case for iPad:1.2 m
    • Rugged Case (2021) #RQ1 for iPad Pro:1.4 m

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 40-1010988, 40-744546
79 specifications
Features13 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers25.9 cm (10.2")32.8 cm (12.9")
Case typeDiffersCoverFlip case
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrofibre, Polyurethane, Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Product main colourDiffersBlackGreen
Colour nameDiffersblackForest Green
CompatibilityDiffersiPad 10.2" (7./8./9. Gen.)iPad Pro 12.9" (3./4./5. Gen.)
Number of stand modesDiffers23
Closure typeDiffersSnap closureFlap closure
Integrated compartment(s)DiffersNoYes
Protection featuresDiffersDust resistant, Scratch resistant, Shock resistant, Splash proofScratch resistant, Shock resistant, Splash proof
Shockproof up toDiffers1.2 m1.4 m
Auto wake/sleep functionDiffersNoYes
LicensedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Shoulder strapDiffersYesNo
CertificationDiffersREACH MIL-STD 810GREACH, MIL-STD 810H
Hand strapKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthDiffers195 mm287 mm
DepthDiffers22 mm232 mm
HeightDiffers270 mm15 mm
ThicknessDiffers2.2 cm1.5 cm
WeightDiffers390 g456 g
Packaging data5 differ
Package widthDiffers236 mm243 mm
Package depthDiffers23 mm26 mm
Package heightDiffers340 mm297 mm
Package weightDiffers30 g388 g
Package typeDiffersPolybagBox
Other features3 differ
BrandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDEQSTER
Colour groupDiffersBlackGreen
Compatible productsDiffersApple iPad 10.2" (7./8./9. Gen.)Apple iPad Pro 12.9"
FeaturesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntegrated pen holder, magnetic closure, Trifold Stand, transparent backside
FunctionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAutomatic sleep/wake function
Lock typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagnetic
Number of products includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Optimized forDiffersApple iPad 10.2"Apple iPad Pro 12.9"
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source234 x 26 x 297 mm
Quantity per boxKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Water bottle holderKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons