Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

dbramante1928 Risskov - iPad Air vs Targus THZ791GL tablet case

22specifications compared
17differ
5identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The dbramante1928 Risskov - iPad Air has 1 more stand modes than the Targus THZ791GL tablet case (2 vs 1). The dbramante1928 Risskov - iPad Air has 167 mm more width than the Targus THZ791GL tablet case (186 mm vs 19 mm). The Targus THZ791GL tablet case has 150 mm more depth than the dbramante1928 Risskov - iPad Air (166 mm vs 16 mm). Maximum screen size: 21.1 cm (8.3") on the dbramante1928 Risskov - iPad Air, 25.6 cm (10.1") on the Targus THZ791GL tablet case. Material: Full-grain leather on the dbramante1928 Risskov - iPad Air, Polyurethane on the Targus THZ791GL tablet case.

Maximum screen size
- Risskov - iPad Air:21.1 cm (8.3")
- THZ791GL tablet case:25.6 cm (10.1")
Material
- Risskov - iPad Air:Full-grain leather
- THZ791GL tablet case:Polyurethane
Product main colour
- Risskov - iPad Air:Tan
- THZ791GL tablet case:Black
Brand compatibility
- Risskov - iPad Air:Apple
- THZ791GL tablet case:Samsung
Compatibility
- Risskov - iPad Air:iPad mini (6th generation)
- THZ791GL tablet case:Galaxy Tab A 10.1"
Number of stand modes
- Risskov - iPad Air:2
- THZ791GL tablet case:1
Width
- Risskov - iPad Air:186 mm
- THZ791GL tablet case:19 mm
Depth
- Risskov - iPad Air:16 mm
- THZ791GL tablet case:166 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Risskov, THZ791GL
40 specifications	A dbramante1928 Risskov - iPad Air Model Risskov View product	B Targus THZ791GL tablet case Model THZ791GL View product
Features6 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers	21.1 cm (8.3")	25.6 cm (10.1")
MaterialDiffers	Full-grain leather	Polyurethane
Product main colourDiffers	Tan	Black
Brand compatibilityDiffers	Apple	Samsung
CompatibilityDiffers	iPad mini (6th generation)	Galaxy Tab A 10.1"
Number of stand modesDiffers	2	1
Pen loopKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protection featuresKnown for one	Scratch resistant	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto wake/sleep functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for one	India	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	186 mm	19 mm
DepthDiffers	16 mm	166 mm
HeightDiffers	254 mm	250 mm
WeightDiffers	342 g	280 g
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers	197 mm	22 mm
Package depthDiffers	24 mm	168.9 mm
Package heightDiffers	293 mm	285 mm
Package weightDiffers	490 g	330 g
Logistics data3 differ
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84733080
Shipping (inner) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11.5 cm
Shipping (inner) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 cm
Shipping (inner) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29.7 cm
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 pc(s)
Master (outer) case widthDiffers	223 mm	240 mm
Master (outer) case lengthDiffers	275 mm	370 mm
Master (outer) case heightDiffers	325 mm	320 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.55 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 pc(s)
Shipping (inner) case net weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.78 kg
Products per palletKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 pc(s)
Master (outer) cases per pallet layer (EU)Known for one	72 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for one	635 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case volumeKnown for one	19930.625 cm³	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per pallet (EU)Known for one	720 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons