Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) vs Onsala Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad

20specifications compared
13differ
7identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Onsala Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad has 183 mm more width than the Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) (195 mm vs 12 mm). The Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) has 171 mm more depth than the Onsala Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad (196 mm vs 25 mm). The Onsala Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad has 52 mm more height than the Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) (305 mm vs 253 mm). Maximum screen size: 27.7 cm (10.9") on the Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022), 27.9 cm (11") on the Onsala Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad. Case type: Folio on the Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022), Cover on the Onsala Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad.

Maximum screen size
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):27.7 cm (10.9")
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:27.9 cm (11")
Case type
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):Folio
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:Cover
Material
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):Faux leather
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:Leather
Product main colour
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):Pink
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:Black
Width
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):12 mm
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:195 mm
Depth
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):196 mm
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:25 mm
Height
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):253 mm
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:305 mm
Weight
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):314 g
- Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad:378 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 8018080452536, 667581
36 specifications	A Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) Model 8018080452536 View product	B Onsala Tablet Cover Leather Black - iPad Model 667581 View product
Features5 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers	27.7 cm (10.9")	27.9 cm (11")
Case typeDiffers	Folio	Cover
MaterialDiffers	Faux leather	Leather
Product main colourDiffers	Pink	Black
Brand compatibility	Apple	Apple
CompatibilityDiffers	iPad 10.9'' (2022)	iPad 10,9" 10th Gen 22, 11" 11th Gen 25
Built-in speaker(s)	No	No
Stand mode	Yes	Yes
Number of stand modes	3	3
Pen loopKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto wake/sleep functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Shoulder strapKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of origin	China	China
Closure typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Magnetic closure
Batteryidentical
Built-in battery	No	No
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	12 mm	195 mm
DepthDiffers	196 mm	25 mm
HeightDiffers	253 mm	305 mm
WeightDiffers	314 g	378 g
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
AC adapter includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers	15 mm	195 mm
Package depthDiffers	120 mm	20 mm
Package heightDiffers	280 mm	310 mm
Package weightDiffers	328 g	420 g
Package volumeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1490 cm³
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Blister
Technical detailsidentical
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for one	2 year(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Combined Nomenclature (CN) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	42029109
Other featuresidentical
Batteries includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4202918090
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Products per palletKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	400 pc(s)
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	43191601.0

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons