Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

Case Logic CSIE2155 - Midnight vs Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022)

19specifications compared
12differ
7identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) has 2 more stand modes than the Case Logic CSIE2155 - Midnight (3 vs 1). The Case Logic CSIE2155 - Midnight has 131 mm more width than the Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) (143 mm vs 12 mm). The Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) has 178 mm more depth than the Case Logic CSIE2155 - Midnight (196 mm vs 18 mm). Maximum screen size: 21.1 cm (8.3") on the Case Logic CSIE2155 - Midnight, 27.7 cm (10.9") on the Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022). Material: Polycarbonate (PC) on the Case Logic CSIE2155 - Midnight, Faux leather on the Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022).

Maximum screen size
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:21.1 cm (8.3")
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):27.7 cm (10.9")
Material
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:Polycarbonate (PC)
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):Faux leather
Product main colour
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:Blue
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):Pink
Compatibility
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:iPad Mini 6
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):iPad 10.9'' (2022)
Number of stand modes
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:1
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):3
Width
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:143 mm
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):12 mm
Depth
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:18 mm
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):196 mm
Height
- CSIE2155 - Midnight:206 mm
- Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022):253 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CSIE2155 - Midnight, 8018080452536
37 specifications	A Case Logic CSIE2155 - Midnight View product	B Cellularline Folio - iPad 10.9'' (2022) Model 8018080452536 View product
Features5 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers	21.1 cm (8.3")	27.7 cm (10.9")
Case type	Folio	Folio
MaterialDiffers	Polycarbonate (PC)	Faux leather
Product main colourDiffers	Blue	Pink
Brand compatibility	Apple	Apple
CompatibilityDiffers	iPad Mini 6	iPad 10.9'' (2022)
Built-in speaker(s)	No	No
Stand mode	Yes	Yes
Number of stand modesDiffers	1	3
Closure typeKnown for one	Snap closure	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of origin	China	China
Pen loopKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto wake/sleep functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Shoulder strapKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Batteryidentical
Built-in battery	No	No
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	143 mm	12 mm
DepthDiffers	18 mm	196 mm
HeightDiffers	206 mm	253 mm
Interior dimensions (W x D x H)Known for one	135 x 6 x 203 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	166 g	314 g
Packaging data3 differ
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers	146 mm	15 mm
Package depthDiffers	20 mm	120 mm
Package heightDiffers	210 mm	280 mm
Package typeKnown for one	Hanging box	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	328 g
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84733080	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	230 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	90 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	170 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for one	1.1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	4 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
Other featuresidentical
Batteries includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons