Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

Case Logic CSIE-2250 Black vs Targus SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 3identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Case Logic CSIE-2250 Black has 160 mm more width than the Targus SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case (180 mm vs 20 mm). The Targus SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case has 195 mm more depth than the Case Logic CSIE-2250 Black (210 mm vs 15 mm). The Targus SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case has 10 mm more height than the Case Logic CSIE-2250 Black (270 mm vs 260 mm). Maximum screen size: 26.7 cm (10.5") on the Case Logic CSIE-2250 Black, 25.4 cm (10") on the Targus SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case. Case type: Cover on the Case Logic CSIE-2250 Black, Folio on the Targus SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case.

  • Maximum screen size
    • CSIE-2250 Black:26.7 cm (10.5")
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:25.4 cm (10")
  • Case type
    • CSIE-2250 Black:Cover
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:Folio
  • Material
    • CSIE-2250 Black:Polycarbonate
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:Polyurethane
  • Product main colour
    • CSIE-2250 Black:Black
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:Red
  • Brand compatibility
    • CSIE-2250 Black:Apple
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:Any brand
  • Width
    • CSIE-2250 Black:180 mm
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:20 mm
  • Depth
    • CSIE-2250 Black:15 mm
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:210 mm
  • Height
    • CSIE-2250 Black:260 mm
    • SafeFit 9-10 inch Rotating Universal Tablet Case:270 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CSIE-2250 Black, THZ64503GL
36 specifications
Features5 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers26.7 cm (10.5")25.4 cm (10")
Case typeDiffersCoverFolio
MaterialDiffersPolycarbonatePolyurethane
Product main colourDiffersBlackRed
Brand compatibilityDiffersAppleAny brand
CompatibilityKnown for oneiPad AirUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Closure typeKnown for oneSnap closureUnknown — not stated by the source
Pen loopKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
GenderKnown for oneUnisexUnknown — not stated by the source
Protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceScratch resistant, Shock resistant, Water resistant
Batteryidentical
Built-in batteryKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers180 mm20 mm
DepthDiffers15 mm210 mm
HeightDiffers260 mm270 mm
WeightDiffers300 g390 g
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers190 mm20 mm
Package depthDiffers20 mm210 mm
Package heightDiffers285 mm305 mm
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source520 g
Logistics data5 differ
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84733080Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthDiffers293 mm247 mm
Master (outer) case lengthDiffers88 mm465 mm
Master (outer) case heightDiffers206 mm345 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightDiffers1.1 kg11.6 kg
Products per master (outer) caseDiffers4 pc(s)20 pc(s)
Shipping (inner) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11.3 cm
Shipping (inner) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22.2 cm
Shipping (inner) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32.2 cm
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)
Shipping (inner) case net weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.35 kg
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source600 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons