Product comparison · 2 tablet cases

Case Logic CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown vs Case Logic CSIE-2252 Black

13specifications compared
8differ
5identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Case Logic CSIE-2252 Black has 77 mm more width than the Case Logic CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown (220 mm vs 143 mm). The Case Logic CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown has 13 mm more depth than the Case Logic CSIE-2252 Black (23 mm vs 10 mm). The Case Logic CSIE-2252 Black has 61 mm more height than the Case Logic CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown (280 mm vs 219 mm). Maximum screen size: 20.3 cm (8") on the Case Logic CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown, 32.8 cm (12.9") on the Case Logic CSIE-2252 Black. Material: Polyester on the Case Logic CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown, Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) on the Case Logic CSIE-2252 Black.

Maximum screen size
- CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown:20.3 cm (8")
- CSIE-2252 Black:32.8 cm (12.9")
Product main colour
- CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown:Brown
- CSIE-2252 Black:Black
Brand compatibility
- CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown:Any brand
- CSIE-2252 Black:Apple
Width
- CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown:143 mm
- CSIE-2252 Black:220 mm
Depth
- CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown:23 mm
- CSIE-2252 Black:10 mm
Height
- CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown:219 mm
- CSIE-2252 Black:280 mm
Weight
- CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown:180 g
- CSIE-2252 Black:410 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CL-UFOL208M, CSIE-2252 Black
35 specifications	A Case Logic CL-UFOL208M 20.3 cm (8") Cover Brown Model CL-UFOL208M View product	B Case Logic CSIE-2252 Black View product
Features4 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers	20.3 cm (8")	32.8 cm (12.9")
Case type	Cover	Cover
MaterialDiffers	Polyester	Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Product main colourDiffers	Brown	Black
Brand compatibilityDiffers	Any brand	Apple
CompatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12.9 iPad Pro
Built-in speaker(s)	No	No
Stand mode	Yes	Yes
Closure typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Snap button closure
Pen loopKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Batteryidentical
Built-in battery	No	No
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	143 mm	220 mm
DepthDiffers	23 mm	10 mm
HeightDiffers	219 mm	280 mm
WeightDiffers	180 g	410 g
Interior dimensions (W x D x H)Known for one	137 x 8 x 219 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	225 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	310 mm
AC adapter includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Screen protectorKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cleaning clothKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Stylus includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery charger includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84733080
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	233 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	88 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	326 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.8 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteries includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More tablet case comparisons

All tablet case comparisons