Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo SC-42E CCTV monitor vs EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor

5specifications compared
3differ
2identical
34known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal: 106.7 cm (42") on the AG Neovo SC-42E CCTV monitor, 43.2 cm (17") on the EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the AG Neovo SC-42E CCTV monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor.

Display diagonal
- SC-42E CCTV monitor:106.7 cm (42")
- FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- SC-42E CCTV monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC-42E, FDS1701-BK
39 specifications	A AG Neovo SC-42E CCTV monitor Model SC-42E View product	B EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor Model FDS1701-BK View product
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Power
CertificationDiffers	CE, FCC, RoHs, WEEE	C-tick, CE, CB, UL (cTÜVus), CSA (cTÜVus),FCC-A, ICES-003-A, TÜV/S, VCCI-A, RoHS, WEEE
Product typeKnown for one	CCTV monitor	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for one	Freestanding/Wall-mounted	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	106.7 cm (42")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160°
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.264 x 0.264 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24.8 - 74.8 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56.2 - 75.1 Hz
Response timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 ms
Display typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.1 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Power source typeKnown for one	DC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	A to G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	48 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	380 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	205 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.5 kg
WeightKnown for one	14.5 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	656.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	240 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	992.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
QuantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons