Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor vs Dahua Technology 65'' UHD LED Monitor

34specifications compared
22differ
12identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology 65'' UHD LED Monitor has 150 cd/m² more display brightness than the AG Neovo SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (400 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Dahua Technology 65'' UHD LED Monitor has 8° more viewing angle, horizontal than the AG Neovo SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (178° vs 170°). The Dahua Technology 65'' UHD LED Monitor has 18° more viewing angle, vertical than the AG Neovo SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (178° vs 160°). Mounting type: Freestanding/Wall-mounted on the AG Neovo SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, Wall-mounted on the Dahua Technology 65'' UHD LED Monitor. Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the AG Neovo SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, 163.8 cm (64.5") on the Dahua Technology 65'' UHD LED Monitor.

Mounting type
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:Freestanding/Wall-mounted
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:Wall-mounted
Display diagonal
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:163.8 cm (64.5")
Display resolution
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:3840 x 2160 pixels
Display type
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:TFT
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:LED
Display brightness
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:250 cd/m²
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:400 cd/m²
Viewing angle, horizontal
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:170°
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:178°
Viewing angle, vertical
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:160°
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:178°
Display number of colours
- SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:16.78 million colours
- 65'' UHD LED Monitor:1.07 billion colours

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC-22E, LM65-S400
63 specifications	A AG Neovo SC-22E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor Model SC-22E View product	B Dahua Technology 65'' UHD LED Monitor Model LM65-S400 View product
Design1 differ
Product type	CCTV monitor	CCTV monitor
Mounting typeDiffers	Freestanding/Wall-mounted	Wall-mounted
Product colour	Black	Black
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Power	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	FCC, CE, CB, WEEE, RoHS, REACH	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	54.6 cm (21.5")	163.8 cm (64.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels
Display typeDiffers	TFT	LED
Display brightnessDiffers	250 cd/m²	400 cd/m²
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	178°
Display number of coloursDiffers	16.78 million colours	1.07 billion colours
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.248 x 0.248 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	24 - 83 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	50 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	20000000:1	1200:1
Response timeDiffers	3 ms	8 ms
Display aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Performance2 differ
Analog signal format systemKnown for one	NTSC, PAL	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in speaker(s)	Yes	Yes
Number of built-in speakers	2	2
Speaker powerDiffers	2 W	8 W
Auto sleep modeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers	100 x 100 mm	600 x 400 mm
VESA mounting	Yes	Yes
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantity	1	1
HDMI versionKnown for one	1.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) in	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) out	Yes	Yes
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
RS-232 portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Power1 differ
Power source type	AC	AC
Power consumption (typical)Differs	21 W	170 W
Power consumption (standby)	0.5 W	0.5 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one	100-240V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	E	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	A to G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	16 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Internal
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 A
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 55 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 80%	20 - 85%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 93%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WeightDiffers	2.8 kg	28.5 kg
HeightDiffers	305 mm	851.7 mm
DepthDiffers	194 mm	79.8 mm
WidthDiffers	505 mm	1476.7 mm
Package widthDiffers	557 mm	1660 mm
Package depthDiffers	117 mm	245 mm
Package heightDiffers	387 mm	1045 mm
Package weightDiffers	4.2 kg	40 kg
Packaging contentidentical
QuantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC, HDMI
Remote control includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons