Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor vs AG Neovo SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor

20specifications compared
9differ
11identical
41known for one product only

Key differences

The AG Neovo SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 46 kWh more energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours than the AG Neovo RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (99 kWh vs 53 kWh). The AG Neovo RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 0.2 kg more weight than the AG Neovo SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (15 kg vs 14.8 kg). The AG Neovo SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 262 mm more height than the AG Neovo RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (714 mm vs 452 mm). Display diagonal: 80 cm (31.5") on the AG Neovo RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, 139.7 cm (55") on the AG Neovo SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the AG Neovo RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, 3840 x 2160 pixels on the AG Neovo SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor.

Display diagonal
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:80 cm (31.5")
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:139.7 cm (55")
Display resolution
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:3840 x 2160 pixels
Display type
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:TFT
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:LED
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:53 kWh
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:99 kWh
Weight
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:15 kg
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:14.8 kg
Height
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:452 mm
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:714 mm
Depth
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:75.1 mm
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:69.6 mm
Width
- RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:757.6 mm
- SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1243.2 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RX-32E, SMQ-5501
61 specifications	A AG Neovo RX-32E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor Model RX-32E View product	B AG Neovo SMQ-5501 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor Model SMQ-5501 View product
Design1 differ
CertificationDiffers	FCC, CE, WEEE, RoHS, REACH, LVD, EAC, BSMI	EAC, UKCA
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	80 cm (31.5")	139.7 cm (55")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels
Display typeDiffers	TFT	LED
Display brightnessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	350 cd/m²
Display aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	178°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	178°
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.07 billion colours
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.245 x 0.245 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 - 135 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 - 86 Hz
Response timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 ms
Native refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 Hz
Performanceidentical
Number of built-in speakersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Speaker powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 W
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	400 x 400 mm
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDMI versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.0
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Composite video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Composite video outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Internal
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	99 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.3 W
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Not available
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	53 kWh	99 kWh
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-10 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 85%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 95%
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, Low Voltage Directive (LVD), REACH, RoHS, WEEE
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers	15 kg	14.8 kg
HeightDiffers	452 mm	714 mm
DepthDiffers	75.1 mm	69.6 mm
WidthDiffers	757.6 mm	1243.2 mm
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1364 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	154 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	824 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18.6 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons