Product comparison · 2 storage drive docking stations

ICY BOX IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite vs Sandberg USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 3identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The ICY BOX IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite has 113 mm more width than the Sandberg USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD (140 mm vs 27 mm). The ICY BOX IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite has 58 mm more depth than the Sandberg USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD (70 mm vs 12 mm). The Sandberg USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD has 61 mm more height than the ICY BOX IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite (71 mm vs 10 mm). Host interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C on the ICY BOX IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite, USB Type-C on the Sandberg USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD. Product colour: Anthracite on the ICY BOX IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite, Black on the Sandberg USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD.

  • Product colour
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:Anthracite
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:Black
  • Windows operating systems supported
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:Yes
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:Windows 10, Windows 11
  • Mac operating systems supported
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:Yes
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:MacOS
  • Width
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:140 mm
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:27 mm
  • Depth
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:70 mm
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:12 mm
  • Height
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:10 mm
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:71 mm
  • Weight
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:127 g
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:38 g
  • Package width
    • IB-DK2107M-C USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Anthracite:100 mm
    • USB 3.2 Dock for M.2+NVMe SSD:82 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of IB-DK2107M-C, 136-47
30 specifications
Hard driveidentical
Maximum storage capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 TB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-CUSB Type-C
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffersAnthraciteBlack
MaterialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneMicroSD (TransFlash), SDUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 Gbit/s
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power supplyKnown for one100 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Software2 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersYesWindows 10, Windows 11
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersYesMacOS
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers140 mm27 mm
DepthDiffers70 mm12 mm
HeightDiffers10 mm71 mm
WeightDiffers127 g38 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers100 mm82 mm
Package depthDiffers45 mm23 mm
Package heightDiffers200 mm164 mm
Package weightDiffers290 g67 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHanging box
Other featuresidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one10000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRTL9210B
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More storage drive docking station comparisons

All storage drive docking station comparisons