Product comparison · 2 storage drive docking stations

ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black vs ICY BOX IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black

22specifications compared
9differ
13identical
11known for one product only

Key differences

The ICY BOX IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 7 mm more width than the ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black (62 mm vs 55 mm). The ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 13 mm more depth than the ICY BOX IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black (113 mm vs 100 mm). The ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 1 mm more height than the ICY BOX IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black (15 mm vs 14 mm). Storage media type: HDD, SSD on the ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, SSD on the ICY BOX IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black. Storage drive interface: M.2, Serial ATA III on the ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Serial ATA on the ICY BOX IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black.

Storage media type
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:HDD, SSD
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:SSD
Storage drive interface
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:M.2, Serial ATA III
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:Serial ATA
Width
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:55 mm
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:62 mm
Depth
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:113 mm
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:100 mm
Height
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:15 mm
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:14 mm
Weight
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:45 g
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:104 g
Package weight
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:167 g
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:210 g
Cables included
- IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:USB Type-C
- IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:USB Type-C to USB Type-C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of IB-180MS-C31, IB-DK4071M-CU31
33 specifications	A ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black Model IB-180MS-C31 View product	B ICY BOX IB-DK4071M-CU31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black Model IB-DK4071M-CU31 View product
Hard drive2 differ
Storage media typeDiffers	HDD, SSD	SSD
Storage drive interfaceDiffers	M.2, Serial ATA III	Serial ATA
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Featuresidentical
MaterialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
UASP supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Card reader integratedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Compatible memory cardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MicroSD (TransFlash), SD
Media duplication featureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Output voltageKnown for one	12 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	55 mm	62 mm
DepthDiffers	113 mm	100 mm
HeightDiffers	15 mm	14 mm
WeightDiffers	45 g	104 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	167 g	210 g
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	USB Type-C	USB Type-C to USB Type-C
Other featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for one	JMS581DL	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffers	Taiwan	China

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More storage drive docking station comparisons

All storage drive docking station comparisons