Product comparison · 2 storage drive docking stations

ICY BOX IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black vs ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 13identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 7 V more output voltage than the ICY BOX IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black (12 V vs 5 V). The ICY BOX IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 5 mm more width than the ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black (60 mm vs 55 mm). The ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 53 mm more depth than the ICY BOX IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black (113 mm vs 60 mm). Storage media type: SSD on the ICY BOX IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, HDD, SSD on the ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black. Storage drive interface: Serial ATA on the ICY BOX IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, M.2, Serial ATA III on the ICY BOX IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black.

  • Storage media type
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:SSD
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:HDD, SSD
  • Storage drive interface
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:Serial ATA
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:M.2, Serial ATA III
  • Output voltage
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:5 V
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:12 V
  • Width
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:60 mm
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:55 mm
  • Depth
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:60 mm
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:113 mm
  • Weight
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:40 g
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:45 g
  • Package weight
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:40 g
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:167 g
  • Country of origin
    • IB-1610MCD-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:China
    • IB-180MS-C31 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:Taiwan

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of IB-1610MCD-C31, IB-180MS-C31
29 specifications
Hard drive2 differ
Storage media typeDiffersSSDHDD, SSD
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATAM.2, Serial ATA III
Storage drive sizes supportedM.2M.2
Number of storage drives supported11
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-CUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C
Features1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
MaterialDiffersAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)Plastic
Maximum data transfer rate10 Gbit/s10 Gbit/s
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsYesYes
On/off switchYesYes
UASP supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Output voltageDiffers5 V12 V
Output currentKnown for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedYesYes
Linux operating systems supportedYesYes
Mac compatibilityYesYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers60 mm55 mm
DepthDiffers60 mm113 mm
Height15 mm15 mm
WeightDiffers40 g45 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers40 g167 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-C
ManualYesYes
Other featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceJMS581DL
Logistics data2 differ
Country of originDiffersChinaTaiwan
Harmonized System (HS) code8471800084718000
Products per master (outer) caseDiffers100 pc(s)40 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More storage drive docking station comparisons

All storage drive docking station comparisons