Product comparison · 2 storage drive docking stations

Freecom mDock Keypad Secure vs Sandberg USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD

11specifications compared
10differ
1identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD has 15 Gbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Freecom mDock Keypad Secure (20 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s). The Freecom mDock Keypad Secure has 79 mm more width than the Sandberg USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD (129 mm vs 50 mm). The Freecom mDock Keypad Secure has 15 mm more depth than the Sandberg USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD (65 mm vs 50 mm). Storage media type: HDD on the Freecom mDock Keypad Secure, SSD on the Sandberg USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD. Storage drive interface: Serial ATA, Serial ATA II on the Freecom mDock Keypad Secure, M.2 on the Sandberg USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD.

Storage media type
- mDock Keypad Secure:HDD
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:SSD
Storage drive interface
- mDock Keypad Secure:Serial ATA, Serial ATA II
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:M.2
Storage drive sizes supported
- mDock Keypad Secure:2.5"
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:M.2
Product colour
- mDock Keypad Secure:Black, Grey
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:Black
Maximum data transfer rate
- mDock Keypad Secure:5 Gbit/s
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:20 Gbit/s
Width
- mDock Keypad Secure:129 mm
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:50 mm
Depth
- mDock Keypad Secure:65 mm
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:50 mm
Height
- mDock Keypad Secure:56 mm
- USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD:12 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of mDock Keypad Secure, 136-72
28 specifications	A Freecom mDock Keypad Secure View product	B Sandberg USB3.2 Cloner Dock for NVMe M.2 SSD Model 136-72 View product
Hard drive3 differ
Storage media typeDiffers	HDD	SSD
Storage drive interfaceDiffers	Serial ATA, Serial ATA II	M.2
Storage drive sizes supportedDiffers	2.5"	M.2
Maximum storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 TB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C	USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, Grey	Black
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	5 Gbit/s	20 Gbit/s
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MacOS
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	129 mm	50 mm
DepthDiffers	65 mm	50 mm
HeightDiffers	56 mm	12 mm
WeightDiffers	300 g	52 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	82 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quick installation guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, UKCA
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 year(s)
Connection to PCKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateKnown for one	5000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	10 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More storage drive docking station comparisons

All storage drive docking station comparisons