All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 storage drive docking stations

Conceptronic DONN12B storage drive docking station USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black vs Sandberg USB 3.2 Cloner and Dock for M2 + NVMe + SATA

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 4identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg USB 3.2 Cloner and Dock for M2 + NVMe + SATA has 5 Gbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Conceptronic DONN12B storage drive docking station USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black (10 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s). The Conceptronic DONN12B storage drive docking station USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black has 95.9 mm more width than the Sandberg USB 3.2 Cloner and Dock for M2 + NVMe + SATA (120 mm vs 24.1 mm). The Conceptronic DONN12B storage drive docking station USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black has 75.7 mm more depth than the Sandberg USB 3.2 Cloner and Dock for M2 + NVMe + SATA (120 mm vs 44.3 mm). Storage media type: HDD, SSD on the Conceptronic DONN12B storage drive docking station USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black, SSD on the Sandberg USB 3.2 Cloner and Dock for M2 + NVMe + SATA. Storage drive sizes supported: 2.5,3.5" on the Conceptronic DONN12B storage drive docking station USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black, 2.5,3.5,M.2 on the Sandberg USB 3.2 Cloner and Dock for M2 + NVMe + SATA.

  • Storage media type
    • HDD, SSD
    • SSD
  • Storage drive sizes supported
    • 2.5,3.5"
    • 2.5,3.5,M.2
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • 5 Gbit/s
    • 10 Gbit/s
  • LED indicators
    • Yes
    • Data, Power
  • Width
    • 120 mm
    • 24.1 mm
  • Depth
    • 120 mm
    • 44.3 mm
  • Height
    • 85 mm
    • 108.4 mm
  • Weight
    • 187 g
    • 100 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
36 specifications
A

Conceptronic

DONN12B storage drive docking station USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-B Black

Model DONN12B

View product
B

Sandberg

USB 3.2 Cloner and Dock for M2 + NVMe + SATA

Model 136-49

View product
Hard drive2 differ
Storage media typeDiffersHDD, SSDSSD
Storage drive sizes supportedDiffers2.5,3.5"2.5,3.5,M.2
Maximum storage capacityKnown for one16 TB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-BUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) ports quantityKnown for one1
Features2 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers5 Gbit/s10 Gbit/s
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYes
LED indicatorsDiffersYesData, Power
Maximum HDD capacityKnown for one16 TB
On/off switchKnown for oneYes
UASP supportKnown for oneYes
Poweridentical
Output voltageKnown for one12 V
Output currentKnown for one3 A
Power plug typeKnown for oneType C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers120 mm24.1 mm
DepthDiffers120 mm44.3 mm
HeightDiffers85 mm108.4 mm
WeightDiffers187 g100 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers155 mm169 mm
Package depthDiffers95 mm55 mm
Package heightDiffers230 mm135 mm
Package weightDiffers381 g120 g
Package typeKnown for oneBox
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffersUSB Type-C to Micro-USB Type-BUSB
Quick installation guideKnown for oneYes
ManualKnown for oneYes
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChina
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMacOS
Other featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for oneJMS581D

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More storage drive docking station comparisons

All storage drive docking station comparisons