Product comparison · 2 storage drive docking stations

Axagon ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA vs Techly I-CASE SATA-TST48

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 6identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Axagon ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA has 1 more storage drives supported than the Techly I-CASE SATA-TST48 (2 vs 1). The Techly I-CASE SATA-TST48 has 5 Gbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Axagon ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA (10 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s). The Axagon ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA has 4 mm more width than the Techly I-CASE SATA-TST48 (142 mm vs 138 mm). Storage media type: HDD, SSD on the Axagon ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA, HDD on the Techly I-CASE SATA-TST48. Host interface: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C on the Axagon ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C on the Techly I-CASE SATA-TST48.

  • Storage media type
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:HDD, SSD
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:HDD
  • Number of storage drives supported
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:2
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:1
  • Material
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:Aluminium
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:Plastic
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:5 Gbit/s
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:10 Gbit/s
  • Certification
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:CE, RoHS, Reach
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:CE , WEEE/RAEE
  • Width
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:142 mm
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:138 mm
  • Depth
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:102 mm
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:82.3 mm
  • Height
    • ADSA-SC USB-C 5Gbps Dual SATA:80 mm
    • I-CASE SATA-TST48:63.3 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ADSA-SC, I-CASE SATA-TST48
37 specifications
Hard drive3 differ
Storage media typeDiffersHDD, SSDHDD
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATA, Serial ATA II, Serial ATA IIISerial ATA III
Number of storage drives supportedDiffers21
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-CUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C
Features3 differ
MaterialDiffersAluminiumPlastic
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers5 Gbit/s10 Gbit/s
S.M.A.R.T. supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
TRIM supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
UASP supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCE, RoHS, ReachCE , WEEE/RAEE
Softwareidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers142 mm138 mm
DepthDiffers102 mm82.3 mm
HeightDiffers80 mm63.3 mm
WeightDiffers336 g678 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one218 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one157 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one92 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one660 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB Type-C to USB Type-AUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Included power plug typesKnown for oneEUUnknown — not stated by the source
Quick installation guideKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for oneASMedia ASM1156Unknown — not stated by the source
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, REACH, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for one3 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More storage drive docking station comparisons

All storage drive docking station comparisons